R
RESEARCH HUB
Blog
Future of Work AI×Education March 2026 · 3 min read

You Were Trained
to Be Anonymous.

The education system built an onramp into the unnamed class. AI is automating the destination.


School is optimized for one outcome: turning you into a skilled executor inside a structure someone else designed. That is the unnamed class. And AI is automating it.

Anu Atluru drew the sharpest line on this I've read in years. Every company is splitting into two. A named class — thinkers, tastemakers, architects whose judgment shapes direction. And an unnamed class — skilled, competent, well-paid executors working within a defined scope. Anonymous by design.

The named class keeps the premiums: autonomy, creative ownership, a seat at the table. The unnamed class does good work and goes home.

"The new class divide will not be what you do. It will be whether anyone knows your name."

School Is Practice for the Unnamed Class

Grades measure your ability to execute within someone else's rubric. Credentials signal you followed the prescribed path correctly. Advancement comes from performing well inside a structure you didn't design and can't change.

That is precisely what the unnamed class does.

Education doesn't accidentally produce executors. It's the whole design. Follow instructions precisely. Score well. Progress through defined stages. The model student is the ideal unnamed-class hire — trained to perform, not to direct.

The Irony Is Brutal

AI is absorbing anonymous execution. Defined scope, measurable output, clear quality standards — everything the unnamed class does well, AI does faster and at scale. The system built an onramp into the most exposed layer of work.

The unnamed class won't disappear. But it will narrow sharply. And the people arriving into it — trained by a system that optimized for exactly this — will find the floor moving.

The Named Class Has a Different Pipeline

It doesn't come from following the right curriculum. It comes from building things before anyone asked you to. Developing genuine taste. Having strong opinions about what's good and why — and being wrong sometimes, and learning from that. Finding problems worth solving and going deep before you're credentialed to.

School can't teach that. Mostly because it can't grade it. There's no rubric for taste. There's no exam for judgment. The named class is built through skin-in-the-game, not scores.

The Question Nobody Is Asking

The most urgent question in education right now isn't which AI tools to integrate into the curriculum. It's whether the system produces thinkers or executors. Whether students learn to set direction or follow it. Whether they develop taste and judgment — or just get very good at performing inside someone else's framework.

Most education systems have an answer to this.

It's the wrong one.


The trades will hold — the physical world is full of friction. The named class will concentrate more power. The comfortable middle, white-collar execution, the traditional graduate destination, is the most exposed. Not because work disappears. Because anonymous work does.


Source: Anu Atluru · "White Collar Goes Blue" · Working Theorys · March 2026 · Synthesis by Research Hub

Continue Reading

Stability Is the New Status. 6 min → The Fuckening. 6 min →